PATRINA
Request a demo
Email records, ready when the question arrives
Keeping a copy of an email is only the beginning. Patrina helps regulated firms preserve business email in an organized archive, quickly search the communications that matter, support review workflows, and retrieve focused records when an audit, examination, or internal inquiry requires them.
One operating cycle
Business email becomes a useful record when authorized teams can quickly find the right message, understand its context, and document how it was reviewed.
Patrina’s compliant archiving platform connects email preservation, indexing, search, supervision, access controls, and reporting in one streamlined archiving workflow.
Work with Patrina to identify the email environments, users, shared mailboxes, and message types that need to be archived. Patrina also supports legacy email import to bring historical records into the searchable archive.
A complete source map gives your firm a clear, documented view of what is captured, where it comes from, and which business communications are preserved.
Preserve business email with the content, timestamps, and metadata needed to search, review, and retrieve each record accurately.
Patrina supports message verification, time and date serialization, deduplication, and full indexing to keep archived content organized and connected to the search criteria authorized users need.
Use indexed content and saved search criteria to quickly narrow requests by users, dates, and relevant terms. Reusable searches give reviewers a consistent starting point for routine reviews and recurring requests.
Create targeted review workflows using flagging criteria, sampling, automated assignments, escalation, access controls, audit trails, and reporting.
Move selected messages through a documented review process while keeping review activity connected to the archived record. This creates a clear history for supervision, follow-up, and focused retrieval.
“We use Patrina primarily to help us monitor email communication between the advisor and the client. In addition, we find Patrina useful in helping us monitor external text messaging.”
“I moved to Patrina as my archiving vendor several years ago. By comparison, I find Patrina’s user interface substantially easier to navigate, and their prices are lower. I’ve been quite pleased with my decision.”
“I recommend Patrina to my state- and SEC-registered RIA clients because their email archiving system is equal to any in the market, and better yet, it’s less expensive than any of the others.”
“We chose Patrina because the solutions our previous archive partner provided did not meet our growing needs. Patrina’s service is impeccable.”
“After reviewing several competitors, Wingo Asset Management chose Patrina and couldn’t be happier. Patrina provides outstanding compliance record archiving services, exceptional customer service, and unbeatable pricing.”
“Patrina makes it convenient and efficient to retrieve emails and related information. Onboarding was simple and intuitive. Customer service has been consistently pleasant and helpful.”
“Patrina’s system works great, and their customer support is extremely efficient whenever we call. We’ve had a very positive experience with both their platform and their service.”
Point. Click. Compliance. Easy.
Search archived business email using focused criteria to quickly identify relevant communications across users and mailboxes
Create targeted workflows for random reviews, flagged emails, and users under heightened supervision—then track each review through resolution.
Quickly narrow the archive to the responsive messages and reports needed for an audit, examination, or internal request.
Platform capabilities
Full indexing makes message content searchable across the archive. Saved and repeatable searches let reviewers refine useful criteria and quickly reuse them for future reviews.
During a demo, test searches using the fields, terms, and ambiguous requests your team encounters in real-world reviews.
Use customized lexicons to identify messages that match the firm’s review criteria. A match is a review signal—not a determination of a violation.
Flag messages for follow-up so reviewers can distinguish the initial alert from the review, decision, and documented action that follows.
Use percentage-based sampling and automated review assignments to create a consistent, repeatable supervisory process.
During a demo, confirm the sampling logic, assignment rules, and notifications support the firm’s intended review workflow.
Limit access to archived email based on reviewer roles, user groups, and responsibilities. Use reassignment and escalation controls to route reviews to the appropriate people.
Map permissions to the firm’s organizational structure so reviewers see only the messages and workflows relevant to their role.
Maintain an audit trail of review activity, including who reviewed, flagged, reassigned, or reported on archived messages.
Use reporting to demonstrate how records were handled and support internal oversight or regulatory requests. During product review, confirm the events captured, available report fields, and export options.
Historical email should not become an invisible second archive. Patrina supports legacy-message import to bring prior records into the searchable archive.
During onboarding, Patrina works with your team to identify the historical email to be migrated, confirm required formats, and establish the appropriate migration approach.
Bring a request your team has handled before—such as a sender and date range, an ambiguous phrase, a departed employee, or messages requiring review.
Use the scenario to test how Patrina searches, controls access, routes reviews, and produces the required records. This also helps identify any deployment details that need to be confirmed.
Capture coverage
Start by defining which business messages need to be captured, how long they must be retained, and the search criteria needed to find them later. This establishes the archive requirements before evaluating features, workflows, or dashboards.
Confirm how the archiver can support your retention requirements and search needs across Microsoft Exchange, Office 365, and Gmail.
Identify the users, shared addresses, and business mail flows that need to be captured.
Then verify how in-scope mailboxes are captured, archived, and monitored, and how the archive handles changes when mailboxes are added, renamed, disabled, or removed.
The firm should control which users and messages are archived rather than relying on individual users to manage their own archives. Patrina works with your team to configure the appropriate users and ensure the right business emails are captured and archived.
An archive evaluation should account for records that predate the new system. Patrina supports legacy email import to help bring historical messages into the archive.
During onboarding, Patrina’s team will work with your firm to identify the historical messages you want to bring into the archive and discuss the required formats and migration requirements.
From message to evidence
Business communications capture decisions, instructions, representations, approvals, and relationship history.
But the same message can exist in very different states: in a user’s mailbox, in backup storage, under a mail platform’s retention controls, or as a preserved record in a dedicated archive.
For financial services firms, the archive must also restrict the ability to alter or delete preserved email content and maintain the integrity of the original record.
The key is proving that the archive can reliably capture, retain, find, review, and retrieve those records when they are needed.
A compliant archive must capture every in-scope business message—not simply retain mailbox data or backups.
Verify that messages from approved sources, users, and shared mailboxes enter the archive, and confirm how capture is monitored when users, addresses, or configurations change.
Effective archiving starts with complete source coverage and reliable capture—not simply showing that “email is connected.”
A request rarely asks for an entire mailbox. It usually targets a person, date range, subject, phrase, attachment, or specific conversation.
Your archive should make those records easy to locate by indexing key message details and content, while allowing teams to refine searches and save useful criteria for repeat requests.
Patrina supports full indexing and saved, repeatable searches—turning archived email into a practical, searchable record rather than passive storage.
Finding relevant messages is only the first step. Teams need to refine results, review responsive records, flag issues, control access, and document the process before producing the final set.
A strong archive supports this workflow from search through review and production, preserving the context needed to understand each message.
With a defined process, compliance, legal, records, and IT teams can respond consistently without reinventing the workflow for every request.
These systems can work together, but they are not interchangeable. Define the role each system plays and what “retention” means within that part of the architecture.
A clear separation helps ensure the firm’s backup, email platform, and archive each support the requirements they are intended to meet.
Use a real handoff to evaluate fit, ownership and visibility.
Real operating events
Situation
An employee, contractor, or executive leaves, but the firm still needs authorized access to their historical business email without maintaining an active production mailbox indefinitely.
People involved
IT or email administration, the records owner, legal or compliance, and the manager responsible for the ongoing business relationship.
Process
Confirm the user’s approved addresses and aliases, verify the last successfully archived period, define authorized access, and distinguish between forwarding new business and preserving historical email.
Remove inappropriate access while retaining the archived email under the firm’s approved policy. Then test a search across both the user’s active and departed-user periods to verify continuity and retrieval.
Outcome
Historical correspondence remains discoverable to authorized users after account ownership changes, without relying on a former employee’s live mailbox as the long-term records strategy.
Offboarding, retention, and access behavior should be configured to the firm’s policies and confirmed during deployment.
Situation
An examiner, auditor, legal team, or internal stakeholder requests communications involving specific people, dates, subjects, or terms.
People involved
Compliance or legal defines the request, an archive administrator builds and refines the search, authorized reviewers assess the results, and the responsible owner approves the final production.
Process
The administrator translates the request into search criteria and refines the results. Authorized reviewers examine messages, attachments, and available metadata, flag questions, and identify the responsive records.
The team then produces the required report or export and maintains a record of the actions taken.
Outcome
The firm follows a documented process from request through search, review, and production—helping deliver focused records without manually assembling messages from multiple users or providing an unexamined mailbox.
Situation
The firm is changing providers, replacing informal mailbox storage, retiring a legacy system, or bringing historical records into the same searchable archive as current email.
People involved
IT inventories the sources, compliance and records owners define retention and access requirements, providers coordinate the migration, and business owners help validate representative records.
Process
The team identifies file formats, mailbox identities, date ranges, duplicates, and known gaps. During onboarding, Patrina works with the firm to confirm supported legacy formats and metadata requirements.
After import, the firm validates agreed control totals, samples known messages, tests search fields, and documents exceptions before relying on the combined archive.
Outcome
Historical email moves from disconnected legacy sources into a searchable, reviewable archive with a documented migration and validation process.
Rules become workflows
Email is a communication channel, not a single record category. What must be retained, for how long, and under what controls depends on the business activity, content, firm, and applicable requirements.
Start by defining the firm’s record and retention requirements, then configure the archive, policies, and review procedures around that documented map.
FINRA Rule 4511 requires member firms to make and preserve required books and records under FINRA rules, the Exchange Act, and applicable SEC rules. FINRA also directs certain records to media and formats that comply with SEC Rule 17a-4.
For qualifying firms, the content and business purpose of an electronic communication can determine whether it must be retained. Firms should therefore map applicable recordkeeping requirements to their specific activities rather than treating every email as the same type of record.
Investment advisers follow a different recordkeeping framework, including Advisers Act Rule 204-2 where applicable.
The practical focus is to identify which correspondence and records must be retained, determine the applicable retention and accessibility requirements, and validate that the archive supports the firm’s specific obligations.
Healthcare, commodities, public-sector, and other organizations may have different recordkeeping, retention, privacy, and production requirements. Evaluate Patrina’s archive against the firm’s documented obligations rather than treating any archive as a universal compliance solution.
Regulatory context
Requirements vary by firm and jurisdiction. Confirm your obligations with your compliance or legal team.
Confirm applicable requirements and product configuration with qualified compliance, legal, and product reviewers.
A practical buying guide
A feature checklist can show that products use the same terminology while hiding differences in capture, preservation, search, review, and retrieval.
Use a representative message and a realistic request to test the complete workflow—from capture and archiving through search, review, and final retrieval.
What evidence shows that every approved source is feeding the archive as designed?
Document the mail environments, domains, user types, and business mailboxes the firm expects to cover. Confirm how new and departed users are handled, how capture failures are detected, and how the archive verifies that expected content is being received.
Include shared or nonstandard mailbox types in testing after the vendor confirms support.
Which email content and metadata are preserved, indexed, displayed, and exported—and how are exceptions identified?
Open known messages and inspect the available content and metadata. Test a reply chain and attachment, then verify how the system handles timestamps, senders and recipients, duplicates, message identity, and content that cannot be indexed.
Can you demonstrate how the firm’s approved retention schedules and legal holds apply to a known message from ingestion through disposition?
Use the firm’s actual record categories and schedules rather than relying on a generic “compliant retention” claim. Confirm who can configure or override retention, what happens when a retention period expires, and how preservation controls apply.
If legal hold is required, test its scope, permissions, and interaction with disposition. A control should be evaluated by how it works within the firm’s process—not simply by whether the feature exists.
Can the firm reproduce its review hierarchy?
Create roles that reflect the real organization—archive administrator, compliance professional reviewer, compliance supervisor, and Chief Compliance Officer. Assign a review, flag a message, and escalate it.
Then verify what each role can access and what the audit trail records at each step.
How will the firm access and receive its data during a request, migration, or provider transition?
Use a realistic request to test search refinement, review, and final output. Then confirm historical import, export formats, turnaround times, migration assistance, fees, and data portability if the firm changes providers.
Confirm commercial terms and costs in the current agreement rather than relying on website descriptions.
Bring one known message, one challenging search, and one user-access scenario.
A strong demo should show how each moves through capture, search, review, permissions, and retrieval. What the vendor can demonstrate is more useful than a feature list alone.
Bring one real client or record journey and ask Patrina to show how the platform supports it.
Frequently asked questions about email archiving software
Email archiving software preserves business email and organizes it for search, review, retention, and retrieval.
For regulated firms, the archive is one part of a broader recordkeeping process that includes source coverage, retention policies, access controls, supervision, and procedures for producing records. The software supports these processes but does not determine which regulatory obligations apply to the firm.
Backup is primarily designed to restore data after loss, corruption, or disruption. Email archiving is designed to preserve in-scope communications as searchable, reviewable, and retrievable records over time.
Firms may use both. A backup should not be assumed to provide the indexing, retention controls, review workflows, audit history, and targeted retrieval expected from a dedicated archive.
Not necessarily. Retention controls within Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, or another email platform may preserve specified messages and meet certain requirements.
A dedicated archive is evaluated separately for capabilities such as independent capture, record preservation, cross-mailbox search, supervision, auditability, and targeted retrieval.
The right approach depends on the firm’s requirements. Evaluate the actual controls and workflow—not simply the product label.
There is no universal answer for every organization. Retention requirements can depend on the content and business purpose of a communication, as well as the firm’s registration, activities, and applicable rules.
Some firms may choose broader capture to reduce operational gaps, but capture scope and legal retention requirements are not the same. Compliance or legal counsel should approve the firm’s record map and retention schedules.
Patrina’s Message Archiving page lists Microsoft Exchange, Office 365, and Google Mail among its supported content sources.
Prior to deploying a solution, confirm how your environment is captured, including supported configurations, mailbox types, licensing, and onboarding requirements. If you use another email source, contact Patrina directly to evaluate support for your environment.
Source listings alone should not be treated as confirmation of specific deployment details.
Patrina supports customized flagging lexicons, percentage-based sampling, follow-up flags, automated review assignments, group-based access controls, escalation, audit trails, and reporting. These capabilities can support a structured email-review and supervision process.
The firm still defines its review criteria, reviewer responsibilities, escalation paths, and documentation requirements. During evaluation, Patrina can demonstrate how the current product configuration supports those requirements.
Inventory source formats, message counts or other control totals, date ranges, users, metadata, duplicates, legal holds, and known gaps. Patrina will confirm what it can import, how exceptions are reported, how searchability is validated, and how records that cannot be mapped cleanly are handled.
Test representative messages before declaring the migration complete, and document who is responsible for retaining or retiring the legacy source.
See Patrina archiving in action
Bring a real process to the conversation. A focused demonstration can show the relevant product path, clarify configuration questions and identify what your team should validate next.
